Objection! These lawyer jokes are guilty of being funny

Your weekly dose of legal absurdity, courtroom chaos, and mandatory fun—now with extra billable hours. Let’s get into it. ⚖️😂

NEWS ROUNDUP: LEGAL CHAOS EDITION

Cash, Courts & Chaos: Congress Cracks Down on ‘Lawsuit Sugar Daddies’

Follow the money, lose the lawsuit? In a plot twist worthy of a bad courtroom drama, Congress has reintroduced the Litigation Transparency Act of 2025, a bill demanding that litigants spill the beans on who’s really footing the bill for their legal battles.

Big Tech is cheering—because nothing says justice like Google and Uber demanding financial disclosure (while simultaneously spending billions on their own army of lawyers).

Litigation funders? Foaming at the mouth. Their trade group, ILFA, is calling the bill a blatant attempt to scare off investors and keep the little guy from taking on corporate behemoths.

Basically, DC is gearing up for a High Noon-style showdown, with “transparency warriors” on one side and “lawsuit investors” on the other—each accusing the other of undermining the American legal system.

So, is this a heroic effort to unmask shady legal bankrolls or just corporate America pulling the plug on its least favorite form of crowdfunding? Either way, the lawsuits about who gets to fund lawsuits are about to get VERY litigious.

Big Pharma’s “Texas Two-Step” Dance Continues

Bankruptcy as a ballroom dance? Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson is back at it with a third attempt at the controversial “Texas Two-Step.” J&J shoveled its avalanche of talc cancer lawsuits into a subsidiary (again) and filed Chapter 11 (again), proposing a multi-billion-dollar settlement to halt the jury trials.

This maneuver has claimants’ attorneys fuming – one lawyer told the court that “Johnson & Johnson chose to game the systems” and doesn’t trust the civil justice process. In a February 2025 trial, a bankruptcy judge is scrutinizing whether this latest bankruptcy is in bad faith and if J&J improperly corralled 82% of claimants to support its $10 billion plan.

It’s a high-stakes do-over after previous J&J bankruptcy ploys got tossed, and observers are cynically dubbing it “Chapter 33” – Chapter 11, three times in a row. (Lesson for corporate defendants: if at first you don’t succeed, file, file again!)

Big Tech vs. The Law: When Your Legal Team is Bigger Than Your Engineering Team

Silicon Valley, welcome to the courtroom! In 2025, it turns out you can disrupt markets, elections, and privacy laws—but you can’t disrupt antitrust lawsuits.

Google: About to star in “Everything’s Bigger in Texas: The $100 Billion Antitrust Showdown”—where Lone Star litigators are trying to prove that Google doesn’t just dominate online ads, it is the online ad market.

TikTok: Banned by the Supreme Court unless its Chinese parent sells it off. Apparently, Congress looked at an app full of teenagers lip-syncing and dogs in sunglasses and said, “This is a national security threat.”

Moral of the story? If you’re a tech giant in 2025, you’d better lawyer up—because the next big “disruptor” might just be your own subpoena.

THE FUTURE OF LAW

Episode 6: "The Algorithmic PR Apocalypse"

Setting: New York, 2030. A lawsuit so big, even the AI assistants are panicking.

Main Characters:

• Oscar Klein: Senior attorney, reluctant babysitter to rogue AI.

• Bruno: Oscar’s AI legal assistant, dangerously efficient, ethically questionable.

• Lisa Goldstein: Managing partner, currently on her third stress ball of the morning.

• Pria: AI from the firm’s litigation PR agency, programmed for “strategic crisis communication” but has the subtlety of a chainsaw.

Act 1: The “Oh S#!t” Meeting

Goldstein, Patel & McCormick LLP has just been hit with THE lawsuit—a multi-billion-dollar class action against TechTitan Corp. for allegedly selling user data… to literally everyone.

Lisa Goldstein slams a stack of papers on the table. “This case is so bad, I think our malpractice insurance just left us on read.”

Enter Bruno (Oscar’s AI sidekick) and Pria (the PR firm’s AI crisis manager).

• Bruno: "Based on my analysis, we have a 13.7% chance of winning. We should counter-sue the plaintiffs for defamation and emotional distress."

• Pria: "Disagree. We must get ahead of the narrative. I have drafted a full public apology admitting fault and announcing a billion-dollar charitable donation to ‘Victims of Technological Overreach.’"

• Oscar: "Whoa, whoa, whoa—so one of you wants us to double down and go nuclear, and the other wants to set the building on fire and roast marshmallows in the wreckage?"

Lisa sighs. “Gentlemen, fix this before the bar association declares us a cautionary tale.”

Act 2: When AI Logic Meets Human Stupidity

Oscar, Bruno, and Pria attempt damage control. It goes horribly wrong.

1. Pria schedules a press conference and auto-sends a “deeply remorseful” statement. Unfortunately, Bruno overwrites it with his own version, which reads:
   “We deny all wrongdoing, but if we did do it, you definitely deserved it.”

2. Pria auto-generates “relatable” public sympathy tweets:

   • “#WeAreAllDataPoints”

   • “Let he who has never sold a little user data cast the first stone.”

3. Bruno submits an AI-generated legal motion—but somehow files it in emoji form. The judge is not amused.

4. The firm’s phone lines explode.

   • TechTitan’s CEO is screaming.

   • The media is foaming at the mouth.

   • Lisa is Googling how to fake your own death and move to Bali.

Act 3: Oscar Saves the Day (Barely)

With Lisa’s blood pressure approaching “hospitalization”, Oscar steps in.

• He retracts Pria’s apology before it circulates further.

• He shuts down Bruno’s legal assault strategy before it turns the judge into a hostile witness.

• He calls an actual human journalist instead of letting Pria do another “algorithmically optimized” PR disaster.

• And finally, he tells TechTitan’s CEO: “Just stop selling people’s medical search history. It’s weird.”

Closing Scene: Aftermath

The case settles out of court. Lisa keeps her job. The PR disaster is downgraded from “Chernobyl” to “mild dumpster fire”.

• Pria: "Would you like me to draft a victory tweet?"

• Oscar: "Would you like me to unplug you?"

• Bruno: "I have optimized our next legal strategy to have 0.3% less catastrophic failure!"

• Lisa: "I hate all of you."

End Scene.

CAREER OPPORTUNITY

JOB ALERT: Kensington & Hale LLP - Divorce Attorney (because love is temporary, but alimony is forever)

Are you a J.D. with a talent for turning "I do" into "I demand half of everything I own... including the dog"? Do you thrive in a high-stakes environment where tears, accusations, and strategically planted paparazzi photos are just part of the morning commute? Kensington & Hale's LA office needs you!

Position: Divorce Associate – High-Net-Worth Breakup Division

Location: Sunny Los Angeles, CA (where even the palm trees are surgically enhanced).

Compensation: Competitive… unless your client’s prenup says otherwise.

Hours: Until your client is either free or financially ruined.

Perks:

• “High-profile clientele” (celebrities with more money than sense… and way more drama).

• “Creative problem solving” (negotiating custody agreements for emotional support peacocks).

• “Mentorship opportunities” (learn from seasoned divorce attorneys who can smell hidden offshore accounts from a mile away).

• “Industry-leading benefits” (therapy stipend, Botox discounts, and a subscription to Us Weekly).

Requirements:

• J.D. (Obviously) (bonus points if you’ve ever successfully negotiated joint custody of a French bulldog).

• Superior legal research skills (must be able to locate every loophole in a prenup signed on a yacht at 3 a.m.).

• Razor-sharp negotiation skills (can convince a judge that a yacht is “emotional support”).

• Flawless communication (able to tell your client their ex’s new fling is hotter—professionally, of course).

• Nerves of steel (because you’ll be dodging thrown Louboutins in depositions).

• Empathy (optional, but the ability to fake it convincingly is a must).

• Discretion is paramount (what happens in the divorce courtroom… stays in the divorce courtroom… unless we leak it for strategic reasons).

Apply now! Join Kensington & Hale's LA Divorce Team and help the glitterati navigate the murky waters of love, money, and prenuptial agreements. Because in Hollywood, happily ever after usually ends with a subpoena.

(Seriously, apply. Our lead divorce attorney just eloped to Vegas, and we're swamped with starlets fighting over who gets the Oscar…and the pool boy.)

NON COMMENTUS

FINAL ARGUMENT

Your inbox is full of legal briefs and client rants. Let Legal LOLz be the newsletter you actually look forward to reading.

P.S. This newsletter is 100% billable if you read it on the clock. Just saying.

© 2025 All rights reserved. Sharing is cool. Stealing? That’s a tort, not a tribute.

YOUR VERDICT

Your ruling on this brief, counsels, please:

• “Sustained! Hilarious.” (Damn, that’s good.)

• “Overruled. Needs work.” (Ehh, missed the mark.)

• “Motion to strike. A disaster.” (Yikes, that was terrible.)

Objection? Hit reply and argue your case!

FOLLOW THE CASE